Bloody Asiimov
 We check the relevance every 3 hours

Bloody Asiimov

skin.club
Case Price
$6.72
Total EV
$6.05
EV Ratio
0.900×
Skins in case
17
EV Ratio = Total EV / Case Price. A ratio of 0.900× means that statistically, each case opening returns 90.0% of the case cost. Results are random - individual outcomes will vary from statistical estimates.

Simulate openings

Roll Bloody Asiimov against its real drop rates and watch the math play out.

Skins in Bloody Asiimov (9)

skin.clubCharm | Hot Hands

Charm | Hot Hands

skin.clubSCAR-20 | Bloodsport

SCAR-20 | Bloodsport

skin.clubP90 | Cold Blooded

P90 | Cold Blooded

skin.clubM4A4 | Asiimov

M4A4 | Asiimov

About this case

Where Is This Case Available?

The Bloody Asiimov case is available on skin.club. It contains 17 skins with published drop rate statistics. The Expected Value and drop rate data below reflect current statistical data for this specific case listing on skin.club.

Case Overview

The Bloody Asiimov case is structured around a concentrated thematic pool, primarily consisting of Asiimov variants with differing wear levels and occasional complementary skins. The distribution is tiered, with lower-value outcomes dominated by high-wear variants and limited inclusion of factory-new or rare pattern items in upper tiers. The case positioning suggests a mid-tier segmentation, where item recognizability is prioritized over broad diversification. Liquidity of items is moderately stable due to established demand for the Asiimov line, though condition significantly impacts valuation spread.

Value and Risk Factors

Expected value is influenced heavily by wear-state distribution, as small probability differences between condition tiers create significant variance in outcomes. The majority of probability mass is allocated to lower-tier returns, resulting in a skewed distribution. Higher-tier outcomes contribute disproportionately to theoretical EV but occur at low frequency. Market demand stability supports baseline value retention, yet variance remains high due to concentrated item pool structure. Return predictability is therefore limited, with outcomes driven primarily by rarity weighting and condition-based pricing dispersion.