Fade Battle
 We check the relevance every 3 hours

Fade Battle

skin.club
Case Price
$26.95
Total EV
$24.30
EV Ratio
0.901×
Skins in case
29
EV Ratio = Total EV / Case Price. A ratio of 0.901× means that statistically, each case opening returns 90.1% of the case cost. Results are random - individual outcomes will vary from statistical estimates.

Simulate openings

Roll Fade Battle against its real drop rates and watch the math play out.

About this case

Where Is This Case Available?

The Fade Battle case is available on skin.club. It contains 29 skins with published drop rate statistics. The Expected Value and drop rate data below reflect current statistical data for this specific case listing on skin.club.

Case Overview

The case combines multiple CS2 cosmetic items within a fixed probability distribution. The pool is positioned around Fade-related aesthetics and other items with varying market demand, condition, and scarcity characteristics. Each listed outcome occupies a defined probability range, meaning the distribution can be assessed quantitatively. A relatively broad separation between common outcomes and scarce premium items creates an asymmetric value profile: most observations are concentrated in the lower and middle sections of the pool, while a smaller probability mass is assigned to higher-value items. This structure makes probability weighting more informative than simply comparing the highest listed item values.

Value and Risk Factors

Expected value depends on the sum of each item's estimated market value multiplied by its stated probability. However, EV does not describe the outcome of an individual opening. A distribution containing low-probability, high-value skins can produce substantial variance even when its theoretical EV appears competitive. Relevant factors include probability concentration, item liquidity, finish and wear characteristics, market spreads, and demand stability. Changes in secondary-market valuations can also alter realized return without changing the published probability structure. Evaluation should therefore consider both EV and distribution shape, with particular attention to how much expected value depends on infrequent outcomes.