iM's Case
 We check the relevance every 3 hours

iM's Case

csgo-skins.com
Case Price
$13.55
Total EV
$11.68
EV Ratio
0.862×
Skins in case
91
EV Ratio = Total EV / Case Price. A ratio of 0.862× means that statistically, each case opening returns 86.2% of the case cost. Results are random - individual outcomes will vary from statistical estimates.

Simulate openings

Roll iM's Case against its real drop rates and watch the math play out.

Skins in iM's Case (24)

csgo-skins.comMusic Kit | Denzel Curry, ULTIMATE

Music Kit | Denzel Curry, ULTIMATE

csgo-skins.comGlock-18 | Fade

Glock-18 | Fade

csgo-skins.comDesert Eagle | Blaze

Desert Eagle | Blaze

csgo-skins.comAK-47 | Wild Lotus

AK-47 | Wild Lotus

csgo-skins.comM4A4 | Howl

M4A4 | Howl

csgo-skins.com★ Butterfly Knife | Gamma Doppler Emerald

★ Butterfly Knife | Gamma Doppler Emerald

About this case

Where Is This Case Available?

The iM's Case case is available on csgo-skins.com. It contains 91 skins with published drop rate statistics. The Expected Value and drop rate data below reflect current statistical data for this specific case listing on csgo-skins.com.

Case Overview

The case consists of skins spanning different rarity levels, creating a structured distribution of outcomes with varying market positions. More frequently occurring items form the foundation of the pool, while a smaller proportion of premium-tier entries contributes a larger share of theoretical value. The case is positioned within the player-themed category, where assessment often centers on item diversity, rarity balance, and overall pool quality. Analysts typically examine outcome frequencies and value concentration across the full selection of available skins.

Value and Risk Factors

Expected value is determined by the interaction between rarity distribution and the market demand associated with included items. Pools in which value is concentrated among a limited number of rare outcomes generally produce higher statistical variance and greater dispersion between results. More evenly distributed value structures can improve consistency while lowering concentration effects. Additional considerations include liquidity, demand stability, rarity weighting, and the proportion of outcomes maintaining relevance in the secondary market. Comprehensive evaluation should prioritize probability structure, variance characteristics, and long-term item demand across the entire pool.